Another sparkling talent-fest is underway with Britain's Got Talent. Does the show unearth genuine talent or is it just a vehicle for fame-hungry no hopers. Have your say and read our resident TV blogger Max Bell on his thoughts on episode one.
i'm a fan of the programme and went to one of the live shows as well which was really good and consisted of the acts that made the final and two that didn't. signature were fantastic, escala were excellent and probably have more of a shelf-life than george who won. but the crowd goes into a frenzy at the mention of his name and scream their heads off when he's on stage, an experience i'll not forget in a hurry. faryl smith was amazing too and that plumber guy andy muir is much better than he was on the final - imagine was a bad choice of song for him and no doubt the nerves kicked in a little as well. :)
P1SH
i am glad george Sampson won . he is well fit and i have his msn and i am not giving it to u Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
The girls with the violins should have won . Not the asshole that did. OOOH isnt amanda holden very sexy.
a lot of it is time wasting, and done as a big money maker.
they only ever put through 20%of good acts, and keep people interested by entering 80% stupid ones. most of the show is not talent.
Report this comment:
Comments page 1 of 98