Pampered pooch inherits $12m
Is it ever acceptable to bequest money to a pet? New York billionaire Leona Helmsley has left $12m (£5.97m) to her pet dog, Trouble. Is this a terrible waste of money or is safeguarding the upkeep of a loved pet understandable? Should the courts overturn her will and leave the money to her family instead? Have your say.
Your comments
-
Stephanie from London says:Oct 11, 21:56
I'd want MY pets looked after after my death - we do it for our kids - why not our pets? The are just as important-part of the famiy-while the hell not!!!!
-
Stephanie from London says:Oct 11, 21:48
I'd want MY pets looked after after my death - we do it for our kids - why not our pets? The are just as important-part of the famiy-while the hell not!!!!
-
Stephanie from London says:Oct 11, 21:45
I'd want MY pets looked after after my death - we do it for our kids - why not our pets? The are just as important-part of the famiy-while the hell not!!!!
-
True Animal Lover from Here says:Oct 11, 21:13
Most animals are better tham some so-called humans - why shouldn't they be left inheritance!! Anials always get leftout when people go round with the beggin bowels. They shouldn't be ignored. Better spent on animals for a bloody change. You get more from animals than most other things.
-
tara reid from glasgow says:Oct 11, 17:04
its her money, wish I was the dog
Report this comment:
Comments page 8 of 124
This comment board is closed.
Debate status
- Total comments : 628
- Allowed comments : 617
- Blocked comments : 11
- Waiting for moderation : 0