1.  
   m from m says:

   Oct 23, 19:31

   I think we should update the monarchy. From what I understand, Charles wasnt allowed to marry her in the first instance because she wasnt 'suitable' to produce an heir to the throne. The outcome has proved that the laws are unfair. He should have married her in the first place. Diana would probably still be alive married to a bloke she was happy with and Charles would have been happy years ago. As for Camillas hair, well its no different to any other woman of her ages' hairdo really. Just overpriced hairdressing.
2.  
   bev dennis from northampton says:

   Oct 22, 15:31

   Money would have benefited any charity rahter than being spent on wicked witch! She should have butted out of Diana's life years ago. Least we know DIANA will always be HEADS ahead on her. She was radiant, elegant, intelligent, gracious, popular and most of all she had a heart! More than can be said for Camilla!!!!!
3.  
   Graham from Doncaster says:

   Oct 21, 18:11

   I couldn't agree more with Fred from suffolk the nail on her head ha ha
4.  
   m from m says:

   Oct 21, 15:27

   looks a proper charlie lol
5.  
   Kay from Bradford says:

   Oct 21, 00:23

   Apart from the fact that her skin tones do not match her new hair colour and the money spent on performing this odd transformation could have been spent better elsewhere....
   
   Surely, her hair is her choice, let her live with it. Thank heaven I dont have to.

Comments page 3 of 41