1.  
   j from k says:

   Jul 2, 22:25

   it may only be 69p per year for each man woman and child, but times 69p by the number of the population and it's a hell of a lot of money that can be better spent elsewhere.
   For a tourist attraction, thats a hell of lot of money for upkeep.

   Report this comment
2.  
   Mick from North uk says:

   Jul 2, 22:06

   Some..of the Younger Royals...need to cut -their Expenses!!!However the big difference between the Queen and Gordon Brown--is "Honesty" had she lied-like him during his term in Office,she would have been out Years ago,God Bless her,it is the one thing many EU States Hate,Stuff -them,--we need the Royal Family in the uk!!!!

   Report this comment
3.  
   MELLY from CHELSEA says:

   Jul 2, 21:56

   PJ DORSET ''WORKED HARD '' DOING ''WHAT'' PRECISELY

   Report this comment
4.  
   PETE from ROTHERHAM says:

   Jul 2, 18:09

   IF 69p WAS THE PINT ID HAVE NO COMPLAINTS...

   Report this comment
5.  
   jan from redcar says:

   Jul 2, 17:50

   do the sheep who call themselves anti - royalists have a brain between them?
   a) the royals bring revenue in from foreigners who do appreciate OUR royal family
   b) what the royals pay in tax etc far outweighs the WAGES they EARN and deserve for the goldfish bowl life they have to tolerate
   c) i would gladly pay £69 a year for the royals especially when you consider what i am paying to the government and bbc per year and for what? so that each of these can insult my intelligence and tell me what i want!

   Report this comment

Comments page 7 of 172