Jonathan Ross will learn whether he can return to his job as a BBC presenter when the corporation's governing body responds to the Andrew Sachs row on Friday
Why does he get paid £6 million a year when he is rubbish, not even funny.He should have been sacked.
i stopped watching and listening to Ross last year . i was listening to his radio show , and realised the content was not fit for my grandson to listen to, i am afraid he went from being quite funny to an old foulmouthed fool, and should be sacked.
I wonder if the BBC will actually read any of the comments on here? Probably not. But if they did, I wonder would they listen to the public opinion? Probably not. So, do you think if we all suddenly stopped paying our licence fee, would we get away with it? Probably not. But, do you think if we all suddenly stopped watching BBC, it would have an impact? PROBABLY!
But, would the public do it? Probably not!
Hey! Mr baker from south west - I think you are missing something. WE DO NOT DECIDE to pay a tv licence, WE DO NOT DECIDE to pay taxes, NO, these things are decided by governing bodies whom we have to abey or pay the consequences. And that my friend is exactly what should have happened to both Brand and Ross.
johnathon ross is disgusting he should never be aloud to grace our screens ever again they say he is paid millions i would not pay pay him in washers i hope he gets his comupance after what hes put that family through.
Report this comment:
Comments page 8 of 239