Jonathan Ross will learn whether he can return to his job as a BBC presenter when the corporation's governing body responds to the Andrew Sachs row on Friday
Okay who edited my input?
Ross might be a funny man to some, not me and if a person can use filthy language and sick innuendoes to earn a living, then the company allowing him to do so needs to pulled up short along with the people responsible for the so called show being broadcast. GET RID SOonEST
The proof of the pudding will be in the eating when all T V licence payers vote with their remote controls. Thank god for other channels. May the BBC R.I.P.
I think its time this was put to bed and we should move on. Before all this publicity I had not even heard of Georgina Baillie?? who has since admitted sleeping with Russell Brand anyway, and from what of I have learnt of her she is no better and has made a lot of money for selling her story, as a result of which 3 people have quit their jobs and one being suspended. My view is that we do have a wide choice these days of what we would like to listen to/watch on TV and if you don't like what you are hearing/watching change the channell or find the Off Switch, quite simple when you think about it, TV/Radio/Papers does not dictate to me what I should watch or listen to I have my own mind, so like I said lets move on and let a lesson be learnt from this error!!!!!!
Judes,yes put Ross and his crew on after midnight and we would all win.
Report this comment:
Comments page 6 of 239