Jonathan Ross will learn whether he can return to his job as a BBC presenter when the corporation's governing body responds to the Andrew Sachs row on Friday
it seems ross,who has been the most dishonourable amongst his colleagues,of whom took the responsible and right decision to resign in this disgraceful,childish phone call prank debacle is rewarded by keeping his job.I WOULD HAVE MORE RESPECT FOR MARK THOMSon AND THE BBC IF HE SACKED ROSS AND REINSTATED THE onES THAT SHOWED DECENCY,RESPECT AND REMORSE
I see all non fans of of J Ross are out tonight. He was only following Brands lead. The matter is closed.
this is one rule for one and one rule for another.other people who have made mistakes have been sacked,so why not ross.he is a foul mouthed uncouth slob.HE SHOULD GO.take the hint jonathan.GO.
I cannot believe that the BBC are to do nothing to Ross - if he had been in a normal hardworking environment he would have been sacked on the spot. Three months suspension what a shame I bed he hasnt lost a penny he will get a tax rebate instead. Why oh Why does the BBC spend so much money on one person his wages would improve the programming if spent wisely on new productions cutting out all the repeats we have or maybe the over 60's could have a free licence.
ross... if you paid that man minimum wage it would be to much. he is just so far up his self, its untrue. he is not funny, he does not listen to his so called guests, and i cant believe that he gets paid such a rediculus amount of money, for someone with no talent at all. what the f... is wrong with ths country.. our government should step in and ban all these hugh wages for people like ross. then they should ban huge payments to footballers, who bore the life out of the public. what a stupid country this is.. start paying the people who deserve it like nurses. thanks for listening folks.
Report this comment:
Comments page 3 of 239