1.  
   Richard from Hornchurch says:

   Nov 23, 00:51

   No, he should have been sacked - he created the material that caused the offence, so should have suffered the same fate as those who allowed its publication. 3 months suspension without pay isn't going to hurt someone on £6 million a year, just a slap on the wrist.
2.  
   RJ from Middlesbrough says:

   Nov 23, 00:49

   To all those who say it was 'just a prank', just for a laugh' etc., I must point out that what he and Brand did was to commit a criminal offense. Had Mr Sacks reported it to the Police they may have been prosecuted. The situation was exacerbated by the fact that they did it so publicly and as a Police Officer I know that my organisation would consider it an extremely serious matter. SACK HIM!
3.  
   jay from manchester says:

   Nov 23, 00:42

   sack him
4.  
   maddy from sheffield says:

   Nov 23, 00:39

   sod the bbc ,used to be good but been crap fer yonks loads a repeats,stupid programme,foul-mouthed idiots, freebies for the bosses and we pay.make they pay for adverts as itv do that way they won`t want to waste so much time,effort,and money on rubbish.by the way,sack ross,the man is a moran and out off control.
5.  
   GH from Swindon says:

   Nov 23, 00:38

   My TV licence is due in the new year, not easy to afford and not value for money. Perehaps the BBC should introduce "Pay-to-view". See how much Ross is really worth.
   Like Enid from Warrington I never watch Ross. I find him egotistical, smug and certainly not funny, witty or wise (though no doubt he would like to believe he is).
   His programmes I never have on. What I do find annoying is when he "guests" on programmes I do enjoy or did.

Comments page 11 of 239