1.  
   chris Taylor from Ilkeston says:

   Nov 23, 21:43

   I think we should do away with the judges completley and only have a public vote, each dance couple should choose a charity and the money made from phoning in should go to that charity. only trouble is the public don't trust the TV bosses to pass our money on any more or to be honest about the voting.

   Report this comment
2.  
   Babs from Black country says:

   Nov 23, 21:42

   The judges were rude and awful to both John and Kristina, there was no need for it, they've never professed to be able to be good but Kristina did a good job with what she'd got. That's why the public voted for them to put the judges in their place and remind them it's we the public that pay their wages and we don't like people who are deliberately rude. Lets be honest it's entertainment in the end, and John has brought more entertainment into the programme than anybody and the programme as had more publicity than they could expect from any one else. I thought his out going remarks, thanking the judges for making him famous was a good stance and onceagain showed the judges what they are, two faced. In some films they were laughing and others saying again awful things like from Arlene 'he's got to go' well the public saw red and voted for them again and again. I was sorry to see them go, I think he would have won that would have been a hoot and got right up their noses. Can we have him back next year please to give us entertainment again for the rest of the tv is rubbish.

   Report this comment
3.  
   Ron from Durham says:

   Nov 23, 21:26

   The idiot public who vote for the underdog all the time have lost the plot ! the show is about dancing and the celebs showing an aptitude for improving their dancing skills - why are people voting for a carthorse when they should be looking at the people who train and try their best to be better each week and are better dancers - john sargeant was useless and didnt deserve to stay in the show as long as he did, but he did wrong to give it up after so many people,wrongly in my opinion,supported him - he betrayed those people !!

   Report this comment
4.  
   oaf from deen says:

   Nov 23, 21:26

   Who knows best? Reality judges or the public? Personally, I think the judging should go elsewhere. If they could find a marmosette with a broad Dundee accent, a disposable income plus shares in a major investment bank and who has a considerable knowledge of biscuits and Portugese sea shanties, I think they might be onto a winner. Failing that, any crustacean or mollusc answering to the name of William. Thats who they need as judges.

   Report this comment
5.  
   TED from CHESHIRE says:

   Nov 23, 21:26

   It wasnt sympathy that made the viewers vote for john and his partner, not by any mens. the reason was that they wee a nice couple and he was an ordinary guy getting on in years with two left feet, and that gorgeous creature he danced with actually seemed to enjoy hbeing with him, and who wouldnt liked to have danced with her.
   They entertained, and they practised as well, and if any of the younger
   guys didnt understand that, then thats there hard luck. but heres a warning, now that the judges have got the reins back the voters will be manipulated so that there votes wont matter one penny, like before,
   im sorry they pulled out, because the judges have finally got their say, and what they say gos from now on. so beward about phoning in, becuase you will never know whether your vote is counted or not.
   Wouldnt it be fun to see how the judges faired if they were to get up and dance. lets see if they are as good or as bad as some of the contestants.

   Report this comment

Comments page 11 of 53