1.  
   Johnny Cash from the Grave says:

   Aug 13, 19:38

   Remember the trouble I had when my daddy named me 'Sue'
2.  
   jj from wirral says:

   Aug 13, 15:40

   yes it is a form of abuse ,poor kids lumbered with stupid names.The parents dont have the brains they were born with ,obviously!!Its nice to be different ,but that is just taking the p out of the kids!!!
3.  
   Quentin Thrupp from Twizle says:

   Aug 13, 13:54

   How about the name Gordon Brown. What a fricking stupid name that is.
4.  
   Spamelot Idle from Cambs says:

   Aug 13, 13:02

   What sort of knob head would call their children 'Benson & Hedges'!!!???
   Hell,i'd love to call my dog 'f**king *anker' cos he can be a complete pain the ass at times,but common sense says no!
5.  
   Logan from Portsmouth says:

   Aug 13, 09:58

   It should really be considered as a form of abuse if you label your baby with a title that will just cause them lots of pain and suffering in future. You’re not allowed to get your baby tattooed or pierced, so why should you be allowed to give it some stupid name that seems cool or is just some kind of fad for the parent. Do these people really love their children? Or do they just want to look chic amongst their friends because their baby has a name that no other has, no matter how ludicrous it is. These “parents” don’t deserve children if you ask me, because they are obviously only fashion accessories. The innocent children as they grow up are then forced to either take their parents to court or change their name when they are old enough, but by then they have probably suffered hell every day at school.
   The first gift you give your child is a name, what kind of blueprint is it for the future of that child if their name is just a joke!

Comments page 7 of 158