Should we meddle with nature?
One hundred million years BC dinosaurs roamed the earth and they might be about to do so again! Following the discovery of the bones of a new dinosaur family, the Ichtyosaurus family, scientists say they could potentially re-create a whole species of prehistoric dinosaur.
Would you welcome a potential new species? Or should scientists leave nature to its own devices? Is this meddling a step too far? Would you consider having the tiny ichtyosaurus dinosaur as a pet? Have your say.
Your comments
-
lucy from newcastle says:Apr 1, 11:42
leave them in peace :D APRIL FOOLS HAHAHHAAAA
Should we meddle with nature?No -
Vikki from Dorset says:Apr 1, 11:42
A big fat NO! In this article it states this tiny little Dino with it's massive Jaw and razor sharp teeth would be well downright dangerous, imagine the harm it could inflict on a small child?! How this proffesor can say it would make a great household pet is beyond me! Also the other concern would have to be if they did this what would they do next? Where would it stop?! think Jurassic Park and be afraid!
Should we meddle with nature?No -
Not Sayin from Nottingham says:Apr 1, 11:41
Well we might as well since we mess around enough with the global climate, im sure a few chicken sized lizards added into the mix are the least of our worries.
Should we meddle with nature?Yes -
Kieran from Inverclyde says:Apr 1, 11:41
If it were ever possible, we should let the extinct stay that way & clone the animals tha are going extinct. Plus we should mess with the natural food chain, remember the red squirrel!!
Should we meddle with nature?No -
Phil from Hampshire says:Apr 1, 11:40
I thought Dinosaurs had already been re-created? I've lived with one for the past 10 years!!
Should we meddle with nature?No
Report this comment:
Comments page 9 of 106
This comment board is closed.
Debate status
- Total comments : 552
- Allowed comments : 529
- Blocked comments : 23
- Waiting for moderation : 0