Should we meddle with nature?
One hundred million years BC dinosaurs roamed the earth and they might be about to do so again! Following the discovery of the bones of a new dinosaur family, the Ichtyosaurus family, scientists say they could potentially re-create a whole species of prehistoric dinosaur.
Would you welcome a potential new species? Or should scientists leave nature to its own devices? Is this meddling a step too far? Would you consider having the tiny ichtyosaurus dinosaur as a pet? Have your say.
Your comments
-
Ted from Derby says:Apr 1, 11:43
As they say in France "Poisson D'Avril".
However, if it were for real I'd say leave well alone. Nature decided they were to become extinct. Who are we to say different?Should we meddle with nature?No -
JAMES from MANCHESTER says:Apr 1, 11:43
do it if you want yeha lungs ript out and yeah house crushed and the end of the world tto come but i say ???????? NO
Should we meddle with nature?No -
gemma from stoke-on-trent says:Apr 1, 11:43
we've had a pet dinosaur for years a big purple talking dinosaur called barney
Should we meddle with nature?Yes -
Rachel from Surrey says:Apr 1, 11:43
Ospyla Florida
April Fools Day.
Same Letters.Should we meddle with nature?No -
honeybee from cambridge says:Apr 1, 11:42
this is obviously an april fool but with any animal or human we should not be meddling with nature we are the way we are for a reason and we should not be trying to change it for any reason.
Should we meddle with nature?No
Report this comment:
Comments page 8 of 106
This comment board is closed.
Debate status
- Total comments : 552
- Allowed comments : 529
- Blocked comments : 23
- Waiting for moderation : 0