Should we meddle with nature?

Should we meddle with nature?

One hundred million years BC dinosaurs roamed the earth and they might be about to do so again! Following the discovery of the bones of a new dinosaur family, the Ichtyosaurus family, scientists say they could potentially re-create a whole species of prehistoric dinosaur.

Would you welcome a potential new species? Or should scientists leave nature to its own devices? Is this meddling a step too far? Would you consider having the tiny ichtyosaurus dinosaur as a pet? Have your say.

 

Your comments

Add your comment
 
  1.  
    Shaun from Sunderland says:
    Apr 1, 11:47

    Good try April Fool

    Should we meddle with nature?
    No
  2.  
    matthew from birmingham says:
    Apr 1, 11:46

    i bet this is a april fools joke

    Should we meddle with nature?
    No
  3.  
    Janey from London says:
    Apr 1, 11:45

    What! oh yes it's April Fools Day

    Should we meddle with nature?
    No
  4.  
    dines from london says:
    Apr 1, 11:45

    WE HAVE MEDDLED WITH MOTHER NATURE IN ALMOST EVERYTHING ELSE-SO WHY NOT THIS TIME AROUND.ONE MORE WON'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE HOWEVER NEGATIVE IT SEEMS.

    Should we meddle with nature?
    Yes
  5.  
    dale from stoke-on-trent says:
    Apr 1, 11:44

    good april fools-wonder if anyones fell for it

    Should we meddle with nature?
    Yes

Report this comment:

This will never be published on the site.

Please tick if you are happy for us to contact you about your report if we have further queries.

Contains offensive language

Contains racist or sexist language

Is a personal attack

Is spamming or advertising

Other

 

Comments page 7 of 106

Prev
Next

Your vote: the results

Should we meddle with nature?

No
60%
60%
Yes
40%
40%

Add your view now

This comment board is closed.

Debate status

  • Total comments : 552
  • Allowed comments : 529
  • Blocked comments : 23
  • Waiting for moderation : 0