Should we meddle with nature?
One hundred million years BC dinosaurs roamed the earth and they might be about to do so again! Following the discovery of the bones of a new dinosaur family, the Ichtyosaurus family, scientists say they could potentially re-create a whole species of prehistoric dinosaur.
Would you welcome a potential new species? Or should scientists leave nature to its own devices? Is this meddling a step too far? Would you consider having the tiny ichtyosaurus dinosaur as a pet? Have your say.
Your comments
-
lous from swansea says:Apr 1, 12:04
no theres enough dinosaurs living amongst us now.... haha April Fools!!
Should we meddle with nature?No -
james from essex says:Apr 1, 12:04
if this was real i would probably ask "have you watched jurassic park lately?"
Should we meddle with nature?Yes -
matt from leyland says:Apr 1, 12:03
definatly... how cool... instead of boring art museams and science places, y not get rid of dem all and have a huge dinasour museam... that would be ace.
Should we meddle with nature?Yes -
cameron from west yorks says:Apr 1, 12:02
perhaps we cud splice the genes of humans and dinosaurs....who knows what we may end up with....a new prime minister...remember geoff goldblum and the fly!!!!! be warned and be afraid!!! lol
Should we meddle with nature?Yes -
sam from london says:Apr 1, 12:00
no hell no abslutely not!!!!!!!!!!
Should we meddle with nature?No
Report this comment:
Comments page 3 of 106
This comment board is closed.
Debate status
- Total comments : 552
- Allowed comments : 529
- Blocked comments : 23
- Waiting for moderation : 0