Should we meddle with nature?
One hundred million years BC dinosaurs roamed the earth and they might be about to do so again! Following the discovery of the bones of a new dinosaur family, the Ichtyosaurus family, scientists say they could potentially re-create a whole species of prehistoric dinosaur.
Would you welcome a potential new species? Or should scientists leave nature to its own devices? Is this meddling a step too far? Would you consider having the tiny ichtyosaurus dinosaur as a pet? Have your say.
Your comments
-
Bob Hope from Eastleigh says:Apr 1, 12:08
if its not a joke fair play. think about it, troodon could be the next dog. much smarter too. and it has plumage. lol
Should we meddle with nature?Yes -
Ray from washinghton says:Apr 1, 12:06
of course we should, it would be interesting to see the results, anyway what the hell, it would not last long anyway, as what man creates, will also destroy.
Should we meddle with nature?Yes -
Alex from Manchester, England says:Apr 1, 12:06
(if not just an april fools) i think that we should bring back the dinosaurs because a pet with a really nasty bite would stop house burglary... come on people this is an awesome discovery
Should we meddle with nature?Yes -
matty b from sunny preston leylan says:Apr 1, 12:05
lol if it is an april fools.. well towt up.. but if it isnt i sey it wud be fun to see sumthing like this
Should we meddle with nature?Yes -
CJ from Portsmouth says:Apr 1, 12:04
No, far better such science be turned to helping repair the damage that man has caused instead of attempting to resurrect something that would quite probably, as a species have prevented mammalian evolution.
Should we meddle with nature?No
Report this comment:
Comments page 2 of 106
This comment board is closed.
Debate status
- Total comments : 552
- Allowed comments : 529
- Blocked comments : 23
- Waiting for moderation : 0