Should we meddle with nature?
One hundred million years BC dinosaurs roamed the earth and they might be about to do so again! Following the discovery of the bones of a new dinosaur family, the Ichtyosaurus family, scientists say they could potentially re-create a whole species of prehistoric dinosaur.
Would you welcome a potential new species? Or should scientists leave nature to its own devices? Is this meddling a step too far? Would you consider having the tiny ichtyosaurus dinosaur as a pet? Have your say.
Your comments
-
ryan from britain says:Apr 6, 16:45
I worked out how to do it last year idoitic scientists
Should we meddle with nature?Yes -
Sam from St.Lucia says:Apr 2, 05:09
Don't meddle with God's creation. There are enough poor ppl out there to be wasting money on dinosaurs.
Should we meddle with nature?No -
billy from Leicester says:Apr 1, 20:13
The most obvious of all April Fool's jokes. It's almost like the person given this task watched Jurassic Park last night and couldn't be bothered to make up something for themselves
Should we meddle with nature?No -
jason from jarrow says:Apr 1, 12:22
if dinosaurs were ment to live then they would not have been whiped out
so no as i would rather eat lunch than be lunch and i don't care if this is a joke. but if not it is still not right to do this as we will be the ones that are wiped out and i am not ready to die for anything or anyone yet.Should we meddle with nature?No -
john from london says:Apr 1, 12:09
i think it would be dangerous if it was to be set free but if this is possible look what we can find out about prehistoric life (it goes aganst everything i belive in)our votes dont count they'll do it anyway.
Should we meddle with nature?Yes
Report this comment:
Comments page 1 of 106
More popular discussions - join in!
This comment board is closed.
Debate status
- Total comments : 552
- Allowed comments : 529
- Blocked comments : 23
- Waiting for moderation : 0