Long-term unemployed people will be forced to accept work placements or lose their benefits, the government has warned. Is this unfair on those who have genuine trouble finding work, or do you think it is necessary to stop work-shy layabouts from sponging off the state?
No why should they - why do you all think umemployed long term means drunks, drugs and layabouts, you should find out the real stuff that goes on. Yes some do fall into that catergory but not all. Do all you who slag others off know what it is like not to be able to get a job? Some employers do not even reply to applications, in fact over the past 6 months I have applied for 60 jobs and have only got 2 interviews and 7 replies.I got mad redundant and have not much hope of getting employment because I am in my late 50s. It is demeaning having to go and sign on and be labled lazy. So shut your silly gobs
What a load of wasters you are! Wouldn't even hold open a door for you, you sponging gits
no why should i work and lose my sky tv ,getting drunk allday. you should be taxed more so i get more benifits to pay for my7 kidsnew xbox y should you make them suffer (he he )
david from manchester ohh bully for u .i was stopped bye the jobcenter from getting a job because they asked me if was ever sacked which i was at 15 yrs of age i was 30 when i applied for this job im sure she could have turned a blind eye to this ...ohh and by the way m8 erm its the unemployed thats keeping u in a job lol
Mrs E Cummings what planet you on we all dont sit all day and drink 1 i dont drink 2 i dont smoke 3i dont take drugs, you dont know whats round the corner for u your probaly one of those greedy sods that have 2 or 3 jobs doing others out of it who need it
Report this comment:
Comments page 5 of 43
Should long-term unemployed be forced to work?