Soldier of Fortune (2000), Soldier of Fortune II (2002), Soldier of Fortune: Payback (2007)
The plot: Professional merceneray John Mullins trots around international conflict zones (Iraq, Columbia) to defeat local warlords and battle terrorists. The late Saddam Hussein even pops up at one point.
The controversy: These first-person-shooters are probably the most violent examples of the genre ever; a special game engine allows you to shoot or hack off bits of enemies' bodies, and direct hits result in rivers of spewing blood.
Censors in Germany and Canada decided the first game was just not nice, and took measures to restrict the game's availability. Part three, meanwhile, was vetoed in Australia and had to have its violence toned down.
Is it any good? The first two games were hugely entertaining and well put-together, but the third outing felt dull and outdated in the wake of the latest batch of FPS big guns like Crysis. Soldier of Fortune was great fun while it lasted.
Click here to buy
"this game was funny man
in no.1 you could shoot the guys penis off while he was pissing hahaha"
*Laughs her head off*
this game was funny man
in no.1 you could shoot the guys penis off while he was pissing hahaha
Report this comment: