1.  
   Al from Cyprus says:

   Dec 21, 19:40

   There are many cases of business and governments being woefully slow to reconcile with the science in relation of health hazards cases, some of the better known ones being cigarette smoking and asbestos, thanks, largely to powerful commercial lobbying and sponsoring. This is just another case. But, like in those cases, there are people who deny it, say it's scaremongering or, often, have even claimed health benefits exist. The commercially biased "slow burn" manslaughterers / murderers says that specially selected micro-studies have not shown significan links to health damage. They only have to open up the limited parameters of their studies. For example to stop pretending theat a few years is sufficient timescale to draw health conclusion. The average Western adult lives around 70 years and their organic gene evolution counts millions of years. But this super wireless radiation (computer, mobile phone etc) technology has had less than 10 years of exposure to the masses. They have not proved no safety and no safety levels. The truth is we are the trial. Sadly again, for financial reasons, the telecoms industry and governments have chosen to make us the guinea pigs of a global and ongoing experiment....
   
   I normally have a headache after long calls on my mobile held to my head. In this age of mass marketing, isnt it funny how hard it is to find up to date SAR data of current phone models.
   
   This is just my humble opinion.

   Are you worried about radiation from wireless networks?

   Yes
2.  
   Bomber from midlands says:

   Dec 19, 22:47

   Least of our worries you silly sods

   Are you worried about radiation from wireless networks?

   No
3.  
   oddn from space says:

   Dec 19, 21:27

   like everything else they were unsure about mobiles. if it affects you don`t use it if u ok well good luck. the only thing like that or rather elictrical that affects me is walking directly under pylons which i did once when out walking. felt weird and didn`t like it so dont do it. common sense really x

   Are you worried about radiation from wireless networks?

   No
4.  
   George from Midlands says:

   Dec 19, 15:35

   There is always a body who is against one item or another.
   I bet its because they can not have any finacial gain from it. there is the answer BAN it. These people must think the whole country have not grown up and are still in nappies excepting themselves.
   What right do they think they have been given and by whom to dictate to the rest of us.

   Are you worried about radiation from wireless networks?

   No
5.  
   secret squirrel from bolton says:

   Dec 12, 17:13

   i use my wi fi all the whooo hizz crackle time and i've big dog big dog had no side effects except my teeth and hair are falling out and my head glows in the dark
   
   no be serious these reports in inverted commas are just used as a training tool the same way eggs and salmonella were linked by one of these reports.
   why dont they put the thousands of pounds they waste doing these into other causes like cancer or epilepsy research, or the reasons for still birth and looking after injured soldiers, and civil servants

   Are you worried about radiation from wireless networks?

   No

Comments page 3 of 14