Should we go back to the moon?
NASA has declared that it will launch and sustain human exploration of the Moon by 2018.
In light of Apollo 11's first moon landing in 1969, do you think the millions of pounds that would be spent should be put to better use, especially considering the huge carbon footprint it would leave? Or, do you think this is a good thing and that it should go ahead?
Are you one that thinks that the moon landing was a hoax, and that footage was made up? Have your say.
Your comments
-
da from uk says:Oct 21, 06:11
it was definately hoaxed because why would they want to go back when they already know there is nothing there worth shouting about. Probably hoax it again
-
GJClifford from Cardiff says:Oct 21, 05:22
Gil from Sheffield - sorry you didn`t see the moon buggy - I heard Jeremy Clarkson now drives it around Soho.
But really of course, it was never there and niether was anyone! -
Jack from Preston says:Oct 20, 22:41
You are one sad excuse of a human Harry from Glasgow. If you have to talk at least stop talking out of your ar^ehole man.
-
Tony from Leeds says:Oct 20, 22:13
Definitely. Now we can go to the Moon. We definitely should. Excuse me my doorbell is ringing.........
-
Tony from Leeds says:Oct 20, 22:12
Definitely. Now we can go to the Moon. We definitely should. Excuse me my doorbell is ringing.........
Report this comment:
Comments page 8 of 89
This comment board is closed.
Debate status
- Total comments : 453
- Allowed comments : 442
- Blocked comments : 11
- Waiting for moderation : 0