Should we go back to the moon?
NASA has declared that it will launch and sustain human exploration of the Moon by 2018.
In light of Apollo 11's first moon landing in 1969, do you think the millions of pounds that would be spent should be put to better use, especially considering the huge carbon footprint it would leave? Or, do you think this is a good thing and that it should go ahead?
Are you one that thinks that the moon landing was a hoax, and that footage was made up? Have your say.
Your comments
-
Vicki from Barnsley says:Oct 21, 16:09
The moderators on here should be sent to the Moon - Ive tried to report a highly rascist personally attacking remark by Rascist Sally from Crewe and they have ignored me twice. They have also blocked my own comment to this lowlife - in which I ask her what HER religion is? and another in connection with her immigrant -bashing.
Moderators are nothing more than a figure of speech. or else they let the racist comments on for entertainment.
Thats me outta here - this spot is not good sport. -
Jimmy from Middlesbrough says:Oct 21, 14:14
I've already been there twice and it's boring, no MacDonalds there yet.
-
sid from london says:Oct 21, 13:48
Why? Did they forget something like a giant alien ship
-
trevor from Aboard a UFO says:Oct 21, 12:40
they say the moon is moving further and further away each year and in a few thousand years the earth with have constant changing weather. i say we send my mother in law to the moon to save the earth and send it back nearer to the earth. all hail my mother in law
-
terry from wales says:Oct 21, 09:46
did we ever go in the first place? no don't think so.
Report this comment:
Comments page 7 of 89
This comment board is closed.
Debate status
- Total comments : 453
- Allowed comments : 442
- Blocked comments : 11
- Waiting for moderation : 0