Should we go back to the moon?

Should we go back to the moon?

NASA has declared that it will launch and sustain human exploration of the Moon by 2018.

In light of Apollo 11's first moon landing in 1969, do you think the millions of pounds that would be spent should be put to better use, especially considering the huge carbon footprint it would leave? Or, do you think this is a good thing and that it should go ahead?

Are you one that thinks that the moon landing was a hoax, and that footage was made up? Have your say.

 

Your comments

Add your comment
 
  1.  
    nancy from bentham says:
    Oct 25, 11:15

    the LABOUR GOVERNMENT SHOULD, BROWN AS PILOT.+ PRESCOT,HE HAS PLENT OF WIND.

    Report this comment
  2.  
    nancy from bentham says:
    Oct 25, 11:15

    the LABOUR GOVERNMENT SHOULD, BROWN AS PILOT.+ PRESCOT,HE HAS PLENT OF WIND.

    Report this comment
  3.  
    nancy from bentham says:
    Oct 25, 11:13

    the LABOUR GOVERNMENT SHOULD, BROWN AS PILOT.+ PRESCOT,HE HAS PLENT OF WIND.

    Report this comment
  4.  
    NULLI SECUNDUS from t says:
    Oct 25, 09:53

    Jeez - my first post should have said "less than American women spent on cosmetics over the same time period....." the bloody PC keeps fooling around.

    Report this comment
  5.  
    NULLI SECUNDUS from TWICKENHAM says:
    Oct 25, 09:50

    That should be "Apollo"...

    Report this comment

Report this comment:

This will never be published on the site.

Please tick if you are happy for us to contact you about your report if we have further queries.

Contains offensive language

Contains racist or sexist language

Is a personal attack

Is spamming or advertising

Other

 

Comments page 4 of 89

Prev
Next

This comment board is closed.

Debate status

  • Total comments : 453
  • Allowed comments : 442
  • Blocked comments : 11
  • Waiting for moderation : 0