Should we go back to the moon?
NASA has declared that it will launch and sustain human exploration of the Moon by 2018.
In light of Apollo 11's first moon landing in 1969, do you think the millions of pounds that would be spent should be put to better use, especially considering the huge carbon footprint it would leave? Or, do you think this is a good thing and that it should go ahead?
Are you one that thinks that the moon landing was a hoax, and that footage was made up? Have your say.
Your comments
-
doddy from fife says:Oct 20, 18:28
half the piggin junkies around my area think they are on the moon or at least on there way
-
Gil from sheffield says:Oct 20, 18:02
We have telescopes that can see/map the lunar landscape down to a metre , the moon buggey and lunar lander base that was left behind have never been seen ,i waited up that night in 1969 for nothing ! .
-
mark from portsmouth says:Oct 20, 17:34
Mans never been on the moon so how can we go back.The Amerians faked it to outdo the russians.
Theres no wind on the moon or atmosphere,so slicing that golf shot is impossible.Theres no wind,so how was the flag blowing from side to side.If the astronought was the first one out,who was taking the picture of the landing.Its so fake its laughable.Made out in the desert somewhere. -
PETE from ROTHERHAM says:Oct 20, 17:31
THEY NEVER WENT THE FIRST TIME,,THE ABSENCE OF STARS IN ALL PHOTO'S,NOT A DROP OF DIRT on THE LANDER,THE MOon BUGGIE WAS NEARLY AS BIG AS THE LANDER,HOW DID THEY MANAGE THAT onE,onE GREAT NASA STUNT THAT WAS WORTHY OF AN OSCAR,,ID LIKE TO KNOW HOW THEY WORKED THE CAMERA'S WITH OVER SIZED GLOVES on?????
-
Tex from Scunny says:Oct 20, 16:43
No problem as long as I can bring my plasma and Freesat
Report this comment:
Comments page 10 of 89
This comment board is closed.
Debate status
- Total comments : 453
- Allowed comments : 442
- Blocked comments : 11
- Waiting for moderation : 0