1.  
   George Findlay from Kent says:

   Dec 17, 18:48

   phyzx from a chair says:Dec 17, 17:19
   How do the IPCC dismiss evidence of natural causes of climate change ?
   Well its in their remit too .
   George Findlay says,
   phyzx, bogus scientists enjoy projecting aberrant mathematics as an answer to any subject such as earth's natural elements. The natural activity of Earth's atmosphere is unpredictable, the coriolis effect ensures constant movement of the atmosphere and there is no balanced formula than can offer a verifiable explanation to erratic atmospheric temperature variations. The arid regions of tropical land mass play a major part in atmospheric temperature changes, the land heat created by the sun is unpredicable and stored, must be seriously considered and not ignored as the pro global warming faction tend to do, very significant indeed.

   Report this comment
2.  
   phyzx from a chair says:

   Dec 17, 18:30

   China's climate change bill states
   Article 4, Paragraph 7 of the UNFCCC provides that "the extent to which developing country Parties will effectively implement their commitments under the Convention will depend on the effective implementation by developed country Parties of their commitments under the Convention related to financial resources and transfer of technology and will take fully into account that economic and social development and poverty eradication are the first and overriding priorities of the developing country Parties."
   Phyzx says This means that profit comes before climate change , it also means that poverty eradication comes before climate change .
   So as no country has ever eradicated poverty , and non will stop social development , This in turn makes the statement that climate change is unimportant , and is not going to actually change anything , in a
   " lets make it look positive and do nothing " sort of way .
   Meaningless propaganda never sounded so good .
   Durring the past ice ages , C02 was up to 700 times more abundant ?
   Warming gas , don't make me laugh

   Report this comment
3.  
   AJH from london says:

   Dec 17, 18:00

   If you look for China's government and scroll do you will find thier policies and commitments on climante change

   Report this comment
4.  
   Goldfish from the pond says:

   Dec 17, 17:57

   Better things to worry about, there is ice on my pond ? control the human population - stop destroying the forests - problem nearly solved with out more taxes

   Report this comment
5.  
   phyzx from a cair says:

   Dec 17, 17:50

   Three top scientists have once again contradicted the claim that a “consensus” exists about man-made global warming with research that indicates CO2 emissions actually cool the atmosphere, in addition to another peer-reviewed paper that documents how the IPCC overstated CO2’s effect on temperature by as much as 2000 per cent.
   Professor George Chilingar and Leonid Khilyuk of the University of Southern California, and Oleg Sorokhtin of the Institute of Oceanology of the Russian Academy of Sciences have released a study that they claim completely contradicts the link between CO2 and global temperature increases.
   “The writers investigated the effect of CO2 emission on the temperature of atmosphere. Computations based on the adiabatic theory of greenhouse effect show that increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere results in cooling rather than warming of the Earth’s atmosphere,”

   Report this comment

Comments page 8 of 617